Tag Archives: American Oystercatcher

Screwed – Birds in BP’s Crosshairs

Neotropic cormorant, Galveston, Texas, Ted Lee Eubanks
The popular press apparently believes that the brown pelican is the only species being jeopardized by the Gulf gusher (someone please let Anderson Cooper know). The NWF would like for you to believe the threat is to the birds in your backyard. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been quoted saying “the distribution of the oil, it’s bigger and uglier than we had hoped.”

Just which birds are actually threatened by the BP fiasco? I will offer my best guesses, and then ask you to send your thoughts in as well. I will try to keep the list updated.

My list of 25 reflects those species that are generally limited to the immediate coast, whose populations are generally restricted to the Gulf of Mexico and the southern U.S. Atlantic (either throughout the year or during a specific season), and whose numbers are low and/or declining. In general I have avoided all pelagics (obviously threatened), since their numbers are relatively low in the Gulf (excepting the Dry Tortugas).

Of course, if we have a repeat of the storm surge associated with a Katrina, Rita, or Ike, all bets are off. Such a storm would push oil well inland, and an entirely new suite of birds would be at risk. In addition, an Ike-type storm, moving from east to west, would spread surface oil and put the Texas coast more at risk. If that happened (particularly if the oil makes it to the southern tip of the state) then all whooping cranes are at risk, as well as the species such as redhead that winter in the Laguna Madre.

Speculation about possible impacts from a hurricane have been all over the map. Here is a quote from Dr. Jeff Masters of Weather Underground. I urge all to read his entire article. His discussion of the potential effect of storm surge is enlightening (and frightening). As one with a house on Galveston Island, and the unwilling recipient of 3 feet of storm surge from Ike, I can only imagine the impacts of oil floating atop those waters.

A hurricane moving through the Gulf of Mexico spill will very likely make the disaster much worse, spreading out the oil over a larger region, and bringing the oil to shores that otherwise might not have seen oil…Jeff Masters

Even if all of the oil evaporated tomorrow (we wish), the Deepwater Horizon blowout is a moment when the America people can see what is at risk from treating the Gulf as if it were an industrial park.

    Reddish egret, Galveston, Texas, Ted Lee Eubanks

  • Fulvous whistling-duck
  • Mottled duck
  • Lesser scaup
  • Red-breasted merganser
  • Common loon
  • Eared grebe
  • Northern gannet
  • Neotropic cormorant
  • Reddish egret
  • Roseate spoonbill
  • Clapper rail
  • Whooping crane (Florida)
  • Snowy plover
  • Wilson’s plover
  • Piping plover
  • American oystercatcher
  • Red knot
  • Franklin’s gull
  • Least tern
  • Black tern
  • Royal tern
  • Black skimmer
  • Horned lark (coastal)
  • Nelson’s sharp-tailed sparrow
  • Seaside sparrow

Reporting the Deepwater Horizon Gusher – The Mangled Mess

As the Deepwater Horizon gusher continues, and reporters dig in the oil-slimed muck for new angles, I believe it important to review just how well the press has covered this story. My assessment is focused on the ecological story, although I do recognize the various facets of this disaster (political, social, economic). In fact, I am willing to fine-tune my focus even further, to consider how well the press has told the story of those without words, without voices – the wildlife and sea life of the Gulf.

There are several groups that I follow on Linkedin, including Green Communicators. One of the members posted a story today about the impacts of the oil on Gulf birds. As with many group posts, this one originated on Digg.com. The story is titled “The US Oil Spill Endangers the Rare Bird’s Habitat Near the Coastal Islands,” and came from a website named The New Ecologist. Given my interest in Gulf birds I naturally read the article, a ghastly mistake. Let me dissect this story to illustrate much of what is wrong about the current state of psuedo-reporting.

I admit that I had never heard of The New Ecologist. A quick look at the web led me to the parent company – Expedient Info Media. EIM, as stated on their web page, “is the premier online publisher of information and news. We publish blogs & web sites that cover wide variety of subjects with the goal of providing expert and detailed information, solutions and resources.” Their blogs include a pregnancy blog, one about pets, and a celebrity blog. Not exactly Scientific American or the New York Times.

The story begins with a grammatically mangled heading, and without attribution. There is no original material in the article; in fact, the majority of the material is from the American Bird Conservancy. I wonder if George Fenwick (their president) would be happy to see his information so thoroughly disfigured.

Most of the article lists birds (with photos) that the unnamed author considers at risk. Ignoring the fact that English is apparently the writer’s second language (at best), the avian line-up, in my opinion, is misleading. Many of the species are not rare, and none are threatened or endangered. This is not to say that all are not at risk from the gusher, but there are many other species in a far more precarious position.

Have we really wandered this far from the basics of journalism, the who, what, when, and where of my college days? I know; I earned my degree in journalism in the dark ages, the Watergate years. But underlying these new media and new communication tools should be something that transcends time – well researched, trustworthy content.

Here is my list of those species that concern me at the moment:

  • Kemp’s Ridley sea turtle (endangered, slowly recovering, although numbers of nests in 1985 dropped to as low as 200.)
  • Sperm whale (perhaps 2000 in the Gulf, feeding at depths similar to this well).
  • Pygmy sperm whale (between 1500 and 2000 in the Gulf. Like most whales, this species is matriarchal, with females never leaving the Gulf. Recent studies show these females to be genetically distinct).
  • Piping plover (most of the world’s population winters along the beaches and tidal flats of the Gulf coast. They arrive along the Gulf two days either side of July 7, although nonbreeders often oversummer).
  • Snowy plover (breeds along Gulf beaches, although numbers swell in winter).
  • Wilson’s plover (breeds along Gulf beaches).
  • Reddish egret (most breed in Texas, and winter flocks in south Texas and northern Mexico can number in the hundreds).
  • Whooping crane (the world’s entire population of this critically endangered species winters along the Gulf).
  • Least tern (a beach-nesting tern, already declining from loss of habitat).
  • Black skimmer (same story as least tern).
  • American oystercatcher (an odd shorebird, that as the name implies, feeds on oysters. The population is small and disjunct. For example, there are probably no more than 200 to 300 in the entire Galveston Bay system).
  • Seaside sparrow (this bird spends its entire life in Spartina alterniflora, the smooth cordgrass that borders saline Gulf waters).
  • Nelson’s sharp-tailed sparrow (likes the same habitat as the seaside, but only in winter. This sparrow nests in the northern Great Plains).
  • Clapper rail (like the two above, a rail that is a saltmarsh obligate).
  • Whale shark (a little known species in the Gulf, although recent studies show that many more congregate in the northern Gulf than previously thought. The same could be said for the orca, a species of whale not normally associated with the Gulf. Recent sightings of 200 or more show that the Gulf may have hundreds or even thousands of orcas).
  • Bottlenose dolphin (the near coast dolphin, although I would consider any Tursiops to be at risk).
  • Redhead (90% of the world’s population of this duck winters in the Lower Laguna Madre of Texas).
  • Lesser Scaup (a species of concern that winters in near Gulf waters; same goes for common loon, northern gannet).
  • Black tern (this interior tern stages in immense numbers along the Gulf before heading south over Gulf waters).

No part of the Gulf is safe from this gusher. As Hurricane Ike demonstrated here in Galveston, a powerful storm moving west across the Gulf will push an overwhelming wall of water ahead. In fact, I am in Galveston at this moment, and although Hurricane Alex is far south of us already we are seeing high tides and gusting winds. One Ike this year will push oil deep into Texas marshes.

I wish I could say that this story from The New Ecologist is an exception. It is not. We have all seen the hundreds of brown pelican photos, the poster bird of this disaster. But many of those most at risk are rarely seen by a press safe on shore. Where is the investigative zeal? Where is the unwillingness to accept the first right answer? Where is the journalistic ethic that has kept this democracy safe since its founding?

If you wish to be a green communicator, begin with the basics of journalism. Follow the following bullets, and make sure that your communications are:

  • Accurate
  • Lucid
  • Incisive
  • Comprehensive
  • Original
  • Honest

Otherwise, you are simply another brush in the greenwashing paint box.

Ted Lee Eubanks

29 June 2010

Galveston, Texas

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ike Impacts on Galveston Bay Oyster Reefs

According to Texas authorities, at least 60% of the oyster reefs in Galveston Bay have been destroyed by the effects of Hurricane Ike. Reefs have been covered by debris and sediment churned up by the storm, and grass and other vegetation scoured from Bolivar now blanket reefs in East Bay. Similar impacts have been reported from coastal Louisiana. Combined, Texas and Louisiana produce 60% of the total domestic oyster supply in the U.S.

From the perspective of bird conservation, there are a number of issues to be considered. First, the impact on oyster reefs by Ike is evidence of much broader damage to the bay system in general. According to Houston Audubon Society’s Winnie Burkett, North Deer Island (the largest natural island left in the bay, and home to 40,000 birds of 17 different species) lost a third of its vegetation. Because of debris, Audubon Society members have not been able to get a boat to Evia Island (an island constructed of dredge materials) that, in 2001, was home to 3,000 birds, including terns, Black Skimmers, and Brown Pelicans. How these colonial nesters will fare once breeding season arrives (and many return from wintering in south Texas and Mexico) remains to be seen.

Second, what about specialists such as the American Oystercatcher that depends on healthy oyster populations for their survival? The oystercatcher has never been common in the Galveston Bay system, with this isolated population never exceeding (in my opinion) a couple of hundred individual birds. Combined with the direct impacts of the storm surge on their breeding beaches, what are the remaining oystercatchers going to eat as the bay slowly recovers from Ike’s insults?

Finally, we are all optimistic that the oyster population will recover with time. But what if their situation is further compromised by expanded resort development on the west end of the island? For example, the pending Marquette project proposes thousands of new homes on the west end, each with boats and their accouterments (canals, marinas, boat houses). Each boat in Galveston Bay will churn up additional sediments that are already suffocating these reefs. The USACE is now considering a request for a comprehensive environmental impact study concerning any additional development on Galveston’s west end. To ignore Ike’s impacts, I believe, would be unpardonable. Ike is the third most damaging hurricane in American history, and all involved in west end development, particularly the USACE, must recognize that fact.

See more about the plight of Galveston Bay oysters in this Houston Chronicle article. Also, read the testimony from the Galveston Bay Foundation at a recent legislative meeting in Galveston addressing these same issues. Finally, you can send your comments about the proposed Marquette project to the ACOE at their website. Please ask that the Corps conduct a cumulative environmental impact analysis on further development (including Marquette and Anchor Bay) on Galveston Island.

Ted Eubanks